Are you suffering as a result of a Nuisance at your rented property
Landlord’s remember if you are
undertaking work regarding removing
infestations at your tenant’s home then make sure that you pay a bit extra and
get a thorough job done or you could be bitten
with a claim for damages resulting from nuisance as can be seen from the below mentioned case.
Siveter v Wandsworth LBC [2012]
EWCA Civ 351,16 February 2012
The claimant was a council
tenant. Her home was rendered uninhabitable by an infestation of
poultry mites. She claimed that
the mites had spread from a pigeon’s nest resting on a cupboard outside her flat, into
the cupboard and through an opening into her flat. The council had arranged to have the
nest removed, but the cupboard itself had not been inspected or sprayed. The judge
rejected a claim that the landlord was liable for compensation on the basis that
the council had acted reasonably in removing the nest and spraying the area even though it
had not sprayed inside the cupboard. The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal and
remitted the case to the county court for the assessment of quantum. The expert
evidence was that, in addition to the nest removal, the cupboard should have at
least been inspected and, probably, treated. It was inevitable and foreseeable
that if left uninspected and untreated, the infestation would migrate from the
cupboard and throughout the flat.
Originally reported by Beatrice Prevatt’s in the December 2012 Legal Action.
This article is for information purposes only.
Deborah Aloba
Affordable Law For You Limited
No comments:
Post a Comment